Theory and Applications of Categories (TAC) is an all-electronic peer-reviewed journal using TeX to define its contents.
Before submitting an article, authors are requested to read and follow, the Format for submission below.
Authors may submit an article in .pdf compiled from TeX source to any member of the Editorial Board except the Managing Editor or Associate Managing Editor. Authors must copy every article submission to the Managing Editor at tac@mta.ca. After acceptance of an article, TeX source code must be submitted to the journal before publication. Requirements for source code are decribed below and should be reviewed before submitting an article.
All papers published have been carefully refereed and acceptance of an article by an Editor indicates that the high standards of the journal have been met. An article may be submitted to only one Editor.
Accepted papers will be archived electronically by the journal. There are several complete mirrors of the journal's contents.
Authors retain ownership of copyright to their work, subject to appropriate use of the work by the journal. For details consult the Copyright Agreement, to which authors must agree before an accepted paper is published.
The final accepted version of an article will be
permanently maintained in the archive without change, except as
follows:
TAC Erratum or Correction Procedures
In principle, any standard flavour of TeX (i.e. plain, LaTeX, AMS-(La)Tex) may be used. However
This allows the logical formatting that is described below.
TAC uses a 12 point style. You should compose your article at that size.
Example TAC source file:
A source file illustrating use of the author version tac.cls of the journal's style is called sample.tex. Its compiled version is sample.dvi . Some hints are linked from here .
Notes:
% LaTeX 2e document, TAC style, 12 pp, Xy-pic ver 3.9, MikTeX version 3.2
Any macro that is not actually used should be deleted from the source file.
The only exception is diagram macro packages. The currently preferred diagram macro packages are those authored by Rose and Moore (xypic) and Michael Barr's diagxy macros for xypic. For visual reasons we prefer native xypic or diagxy to the xymatrix package. See diagxy-xymatrix.pdf for a consideration of the differences. The author is responsible to ensure that the current version of a macro package has been used.
Authors should note that the base font size is 12 point. Avoid use of elements which depend on another base font size. This is another reason to avoid absolute moves such as `\vskip 10 pt'. Remember that the journal's pagination will differ from yours. As a general rule less, but more logical, formatting is better.
Authors are strongly encouraged to use only fonts from the standard TeX distribution (cmr etc.), AMS symbol fonts (msym...) or the Xy-pic fonts. They should be aware that use of non-standard fonts can interfere with successful dissemination of their work. Fonts not mentioned must be provided by the author to the journal.
LaTeX is the preferred format. Failure to use LaTeX will delay consideration of an article, and an article may be returned to the author for modification. If not using TAC style, do use a 12 point style file.
A LaTeX 2e style file for TAC articles is available here . Using this style before final submission of an article will greatly reduce the acceptance to publication delay.
Whether or not the journal's style is used, the most important advice for an author of TAC (or any electronic journal or even any journal that accepts TeXscripts) is to use logical, rather than physical formatting. That is, instead of beginning a section by saying
\medskip
\noindent{\bf 4.3 The main theorem.}
just say
\section{The main theorem}\label{mainth}
(The \label will be explained below.) Instead of saying
\smallskip
\noindent{\sc Theorem A}{\it ...}
say
\begin{theorem}\label{thmA} ... \end{theorem}
(shorter forms as will be explained later).
You should probably never put explicit skips and kerns into your paper. Suppose, for example, you want to go on to a new topic and want to leave a little space. The preferable way is to say
\subsubsection*{}
which will have exactly that effect. But in fact, it is probably always appropriate to start a new subsection in such a case. Except in very long papers, we discourage the use of three indexing levels.
The point is to use symbolic formatting and let the journals put in their own style.
All versions of LaTeX provide definitions for \section, \subsection, and \subsubsection. It even goes further, but these should be enough for nearly all papers. They do not provide definitions for \begin{theorem} and the like. But the TAC style files provide a \newtheorem macro that is used as follows. Place at the beginning of your paper, the following:
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
\newtheorem{proposition}{Proposition}
... (whatever is needed)
The first parameter is what you will call it in your TeXscript and the second what it will be called in your paper. So you can just as well say
\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}
...
and then you can enclose your theorems in \begin{thm}...\end{thm} or even \thm...\endthm. Beware that you lose certain error checking with the latter form.
A theorem (or any theorem-like environment), whether introduced by \theorem or by \begin{theorem} may have an optional argument that is material to be set in upright font and enclosed in square brackets. This is normally used to give credit, but may also be used for naming the theorem. For example,
\theorem[Fermat's last theorem] For any integers ...\endtheorem
will result in
THEOREM [Fermat's last theorem] For any integers ...
and
\theorem[Fermat's last theorem \cite{w94}] For any integers
...\endtheorem
might result in
THEOREM [Fermat's last theorem [Wiles, 1994]] For any integers ...
A few points should be noted. If the parenthetical material itself contains brackets, then it must be enclosed in braces. For example,
\theorem[Fermat's last theorem {\cite[Theorem 4.7]{w94}}] For any
integers ...\endtheorem
will result in only one pair of brackets in the output, not two. Nothing (in particular no \label) may intervene between \theorem or \begin{theorem} and this parenthetical remark. A \label can follow this argument with no change in functionality.
TAC uses the \subsection counter to assign numbering to proclaimed items (like definitions and theorem statements). Thus they, and numbered subsections, are numbered sequentially within a section. Some authors may prefer numbering of proclaimed items within a subsection, and for this the \thirdleveltheorems macro is available. For the (usually short) articles without sections, authors may use \firstlevel theorems.
All TeX users should be aware that it is absolutely standard in mathematical typography that single characters should be in italics and multi-character identifiers should be in upright type. That is how the reader tells Hom from H times o times m (even if s/he hasn't consciously learned the rule).
In order to make this
easy to implement, TAC provides a number of useful macros that authors are free to use.
The first group all have the same syntax and provide an easy way to
create macros that produce characters or strings in different fonts.
They are:
\mathrmdef
\mathbfdef
\mathssbxdef
\mathfkdef
\mathzcdef
\mathcaldef
\mathrsfsdef
\mathopdef
\mathopsldef
The syntax: If you say \mathrmdef{Hom} you create a macro named \Hom that sets Hom in roman type with the usual spacing of a word. If, instead you say \mathrmdef[hom]{Hom} you get a macro named \hom that produces Hom, just as above. If you use that instead of just Hom, the results will look much better. Using just Hom in math mode will result in an italic font and ugly spacing that is more appropriate to a ternary product.
The semantics: \mathrmdef is as described; \mathbfdef produces bold characters; \mathssbxdef produces characters in an extra bold sans serif font; \mathfkdef makes fraktur producing macros; \mathzcdef produces Zapf Chancery, (a useful script font that includes both upper and lower case letters so that \mathzcdef{Set} makes a macro \Set that gives Set in that font); \mathrsfsdef defines a macro that uses Ralph Smith fancy script; \mathcaldef gives the standard calligraphic forms; finally \mathopdef makes \mathop{}s, explained below, using roman character, while \mathopsldef does the same using slant characters (almost, but not quite the same as italic).
Perhaps the only place \mathop is clearly explained is in the TeXBook (The description in The LaTeX Companion is just wrong; \mathop is used only to define large operators). If you define a macro such as \lim as a mathop, which you can by the TAC macro \mathopdef{lim} or in standard plain (or LaTeX for that matter by \def\lim{\mathop{\rm lim}} you have defined a macro that sets "lim" in roman type, leaves a \thinspace after it (unless followed by a "(" or other token of type \mathopen) and, in display mode only, puts any subscript underneath instead of to the right. However, this last can be overruled. If you type \lim\limits_{whatever}, even online, the result is to put the "whatever" underneath, while if you type \lim\nolimits_{whatever}, even in a display, the effect is to subscript the "whatever" on the right. (If you are interested, these names mean "limitswitch" and "nolimitswitch".)
Two more comments: the macros defined using these defining macros can be used in either math mode or not. Also, they add space after themselves unless followed by punctuation marks or certain other symbols (like braces). So if you define, say, \mathzcdef[Asc]{A}, you can say, "Let \Asc be a category" and you will get no complaint that you were not in math mode and there will be a space after the script "A". If you have defined \mathrmdef[nbd]{neighbourhood}, then you cannot say \nbd s to get the plural since the space will be added, but either \nbd{s} or \nbd{}s will work fine.
Another useful macro that we supply is \mld. It is used in a display as
follows:
$$\mld formula1& formula2\\formula3\\formula4\\...$$
and produces a multi-line display formatted as
formula1 formula2 formula3 formula4 ...
Only one & is to be used and it can occur anywhere except that if formula1 is empty, you should use \mld{}&. This is a bug that might be fixed some day.
The diagram macros we recommend are xy-pic and diagxy. The latter is a front end to the former and they can be used in the same document. There are two advantages to diagxy. Simple diagrams like squares and various shapes of trianges are predefined, needing only the nodes and arrow labels filled in. Second, the user has much more precise control over positioning and spacing. You do not have to choose between putting something one node to the right where the label does not quite fit or two where the arrow is too long. See diagxy-xymatrix.pdf for an consideration of the differences. However, this is a matter of taste that we leave to the author.
When you want to refer to Theorem A (which will not be called that in the TAC style) of Section 4.3, refer to it as Theorem~\ref{thmA} of Section~\ref{mainth}. The labels you use are totally arbitrary, of course, so long as they are not reused in the same paper. Use of symbolic labels allows you to insert or delete material without having to renumber everything or to wind up with sections or theorems bis. The ~, by the way, is an unbreakable space so that the theorem or section number does not get separated from the word Theorem or Section. This is considered poor style, although it is not terribly important. It is also an element of good style to capitalize the words Section and Theorem when followed by an explicit reference. However, they are not capitalized in such phrases as "next section" and "the main theorem".
If BiBTeX is used with LaTeX, bibliographies must be BiBTeXed and .bbl files appended to the source file. No .bib files will be accepted.
References may use the standard BiBTeX styles or the two bibliography styles that TAC supports. We recommend the first TAC style. It is much more useful for the reader since it puts citations like [Grothendieck, 1957] in your text (you can probably already guess the reference) and the reference in the form
\item A. Grothendieck (1957), Sur quelques points d'alg\'ebre homologique, T\^ohoku
Math. J. \em{3}, 120-221.
You get the first style by preceding your references with
\begin{references}
and ending the list of \items with
\end{references}
The second style is traditional and puts [4] into your paper with the reference in the traditional form
\item A. Grothendieck, Sur quelques points d'alg\'ebre homologique, T\^ohoku
Math. J. \em{3} (1957), 120-221.
To obtain it use
\begin{references*}
\item ...
\end{references*}
except you will almost surely want to use \bibitem, allowing you to put in a symbolic label.
There are two mistakes made by many users of TeX that appear in print over and over and are easy to avoid.
The first is to have multicharacter identifiers slanted (like math symbols), rather than in upright type. This refers to names like sin, cos,... but also Hom, Tor, Id, ker, Im, .... The TAC style files provide macros that can automate this, as noted above.
The second error is to use < ... > for angle brackets. You have no idea how bad this will look. The < and > produce the wrong shape for angle brackets, but mainly they produce the wrong spacing and the results can be ludicrous, especially if an = follows > or precedes <. The official way to do this is to say \langle and \rangle. Many papers in TAC use these angle brackets extensively and make little or no use of the inequality signs. If this is your case, we recommend the following. At the top of your paper, put:
\mathcode`\<="4268 %left delimiter
\mathcode`\>="5269 %right delimiter
\mathchardef\gt="313E %relation
\mathchardef\lt="313C %relation
The effect of the first two lines is to make < and > into \langle and \rangle, respectively, so that you can use them freely. The third and fourth lines allow you to use \lt and \gt for the inequality signs. This is not done in the TAC styles because an author has the right to use < and > for the inequalites if desired.
Although these instructions are specific to TAC, they should go a long way towards making your papers usable by any journal that is serious about using author-supplied TeX.
Return to Main Page.
1. The primary archive of Theory and Applications of Categories(TAC) is a set of electronic files in TeX source, dvi, pdf and pk font formats. The source files contain all articles accepted in TAC and any macro files required to typeset them. The dvi files are those produced from the articles by the TeX program (version 3.14). Font files to allow printing of accepted articles must also be maintained. This archive is the property of the Editorial Board of TAC and is maintained by the Managing Editor.
2. A secondary electronic archive of TAC is maintained by The National Library of Canada at http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/201/300/tac/index.html as part of its Electronic Collection.
3. A paper copy of the typeset version of each article accepted in TAC is provided to the Mount Allison University Library for archiving.
Return to Information for Authors.
The style file for the journal is:
tac.cls
It was modified from the LaTeX article style by Michael Barr
and TAC authors.
Also available are brief hints on how to use the style files. Please consult that page only in conjunction with the full Format for Submission. For advice on use of other flavours of TeX, please write to the Managing Editor, Robert Rosebrugh, rrosebrugh@mta.ca
Return to Format for Submission
The links here are to macro packages (and their documentation) intended to facilitate creation of diagrams in (La)TeX.
The links below are to appropriate directories at a CTAN (Comprehensive TeX Archive Network) site. Try ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive or www.dante.de The packages are:
Michael Barr's front-end for XY-pic. It uses syntax similar to
his now obsolete package based on the LaTeX
picture mode and, in the opinion of the TAC Managing Editor,
provides the most attractive output for typeset
categorical diagrams.
It is at
ftp://ftp.math.mcgill.ca/pub/barr/diagxy.zip
Kris Rose and Ross Moore's XY-pic package is at
ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/macros/generic/diagrams/xypic
See diagxy-xymatrix.pdf for a consideration of the differences.
Return to Format for submission.