% primitive.tex

\documentclass[12pt]{article}%{amsart}
\textwidth= 6.5in
\textheight= 9.0in
\topmargin = -20pt
\evensidemargin=0pt
\oddsidemargin=0pt
\headsep=25pt
\parskip=10pt
\font\smallit=cmti10
\font\smalltt=cmtt10
\font\smallrm=cmr9

\usepackage{amsmath,latexsym}

\newcommand{\Z}{\ensuremath{\mathbf Z}}
\newcommand{\Zd}{\ensuremath{ {\mathbf Z}^d }}
\newcommand{\N}{\ensuremath{ \mathbf N }}
\newcommand{\Q}{\ensuremath{ \mathbf{Q} }}
\newcommand{\R}{\ensuremath{ \mathbf{R} }}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
\newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}
\newtheorem{corollary}{Corollary}
\newcommand{\bt}{\begin{theorem}}
\newcommand{\et}{\end{theorem}}
\newcommand{\bl}{\begin{lemma}}
\newcommand{\el}{\end{lemma}}
\newcommand{\bc}{\begin{corollary}}
\newcommand{\ec}{\end{corollary}}
\newcommand{\benum}{\begin{enumerate}}
\newcommand{\eenum}{\end{enumerate}}
\newcommand{\card}{\ensuremath{\text{card}}}

\makeatletter %% this should really go into a style file!

\renewcommand\section{\@startsection {section}{1}{\z@}%
                                 % {-3.5ex \@plus -1ex \@minus -.2ex}%
        % here is your vskip of 30pt:
                                   {-30pt  \@plus -1ex \@minus -.2ex}%
                                   {2.3ex \@plus.2ex}%
                                   {\normalfont\normalsize\bfseries}}

\renewcommand\subsection{\@startsection{subsection}{2}{\z@}%
                                     {-3.25ex\@plus -1ex \@minus -.2ex}%
                                     {1.5ex \@plus .2ex}%
                                     {\normalfont\normalsize\bfseries}}
        % add a point after section numbers:

\renewcommand{\@seccntformat}[1]{\csname the#1\endcsname. } %\quad}

\makeatother



\begin{document} 
\vspace*{-40pt}
\centerline{\smalltt INTEGERS: \smallrm
ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL NUMBER THEORY \smalltt 7
(2007), \#A01}
\vskip 40pt

%\title[Affine invariants and relatively prime sets]{Affine invariants,
%relatively prime sets, and a phi function for subsets of
%$\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$}
%\author{Melvyn B. Nathanson}

%\address{Lehman College (CUNY),Bronx, New York 10468}
%\email{melvyn.nathanson@lehman.cuny.edu}
%\thanks{This work was supported in part by grants from the NSA
%Mathematical Sciences Program and the PSC-CUNY Research Award Program.}
%\subjclass[2000]{Primary 11A25, 11B05, 11B13, 11B75.} 
%\keywords{Relatively prime sets, Euler phi function, combinatorial
%number theory, elementary number theory.}


%\date{\today}


%\maketitle

\begin{center}
\uppercase{\bf Affine invariants,
relatively prime sets, and a phi function for subsets of
$\mathbf{\{1,2,\ldots,n\}}$}
\vskip 20pt
{\bf Melvyn B. Nathanson\footnote{This work was supported
 in part by grants from the NSA
Mathematical Sciences Program and the PSC-CUNY Research Award Program.}}\\
%{\smallit 5040 Ingersoll Pl, Boulder, CO 80303, USA}\\
{\smallit Lehman College (CUNY), Bronx, New York 10468}\\
{\tt melvyn.nathanson@lehman.cuny.edu}\\
\end{center}
\vskip 30pt
\centerline{\smallit Received: 8/15/06,
Accepted: 12/29/06, Published: 1/3/07}
\vskip 30pt 

\centerline{\bf Abstract}
\noindent
A nonempty subset $A$ of $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ is 
{\em relatively prime} if $\gcd(A)=1.$  Let $f(n)$ and $f_k(n)$ denote,
respectively, the number of relatively prime subsets and the number of
relatively prime subsets of cardinality $k$ of $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$.  Let
$\Phi(n)$ and $\Phi_k(n)$ denote, respectively,  the number of nonempty
subsets and the number of  subsets of cardinality $k$ of
$\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ such that $\gcd(A)$ is relatively prime to $n$.  
Exact formulas and asymptotic estimates are obtained for these functions.

\footnotesize
\noindent
Subject class: Primary 11A25, 11B05, 11B13, 11B75.

\noindent
Keywords: Relatively prime sets, Euler phi function, combinatorial
%number theory, elementary number theory.

\normalsize

\pagestyle{myheadings}
\markright{\smalltt INTEGERS: \smallrm ELECTRONIC JOURNAL
 OF COMBINATORIAL NUMBER THEORY \smalltt 7 (2007), \#A01\hfill}

\thispagestyle{empty} 
\baselineskip=15pt 
\vskip 30pt 

\section{Affine Invariants}
Let $A$ be a set of integers, and let $x$ and $y$ be rational numbers.  We define the {\em dilation} $x\ast A = \{xa: a \in A\}$ and the {\em translation} $A + y = \{a+y : a \in A\}$.  Sets of integers $A$ and $B$ are {\em affinely equivalent} if 
there exist rational numbers $x \neq 0$ and $y$ such that $B = x\ast A + y$.   For example, the sets $A = \{2,8,11,20\}$ and $B = \{-4,10,17,38 \}$ are affinely equivalent, since $B = (7/3)\ast A - 26/3 $, and $A$ and $B$ are both affinely equivalent to the sets $C = \{0,2,3,6\}$  and $D = \{0,3,4,6\}$.  Every set with one element is affinely equivalent to $\{0\}$.  Every finite set $A$ of integers with more than one element is affinely equivalent to unique sets $C$ and $D$ of nonnegative integers such that $\min(C)=\min(D)=0$, $\gcd(C) = \gcd(D) = 1$, and $D = (-1)\ast C +\max(C).$

A function $f(A)$ whose domain is the set $\mathcal{F}(\Z)$ of nonempty finite sets of integers is called an {\em affine invariant} of $\mathcal{F}(\Z)$ if $f(A) = f(B)$ for all affinely equivalent sets $A$ and $B$.  For example, if $A+A = \{ a+a' : a,a'\in A\}$ is the sumset of a finite set $A$ of integers, and if $A-A  = \{ a-a' : a,a'\in A\}$ is the difference set of the finite set $A$, then $s(A) = \card(A+A)$ and $d(A) = \card(A-A)$ are affine invariants.   More generally, let $u_0,u_1,\ldots, u_n$ be integers and $F(x_1,\ldots,x_n) = u_1x_1+\cdots + u_nx_n+u_0$.  Define $F(A) = \{u_1a_1+\cdots + u_na_n+u_0 : a_1,\ldots,a_n \in A \text{ for } i=1,\ldots,n\}.$  Then $f(A) = \card(F(A))$ is an affine invariant.

Let $f(A)$ be a function with domain $\mathcal{F}(\Z)$.  A frequent problem in combinatorial number theory is to determine the distribution of values of the function $f(A)$ for sets $A$ in the interval of integers $\{0,1,\ldots,n\}$.
For example, if $A \subseteq \{0,1,2,\ldots,n\}$, then $1 \leq \card(A+A) \leq 2n+1$.  For $\ell = 1,\ldots, 2n+1$, we can ask for the number of nonempty sets $A \subseteq \{0,1,2,\ldots,n\}$ such that $\card(A+A) = \ell$.
Similarly, if $\emptyset \neq A \subseteq \{0,1,2,\ldots,n\}$ and $\card(A) = k$, then $2k-1 \leq \card(A+A) \leq k(k+1)/2$, and, for $\ell = 2k-1,\ldots,k(k+1)/2$, we can ask for the number of such sets $A$ with $\card(A+A) = \ell$.
In both cases, there is a redundancy in considering sets that are affinely equivalent, and we might want to count only sets that are pairwise affinely inequivalent. 



\section{Relatively Prime Sets}
A nonempty subset $A$ of $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ will be called {\it relatively prime} if the elements of $A$ are relatively prime, that is, if $\gcd(A)=1$.
Let $f(n)$ denote the number of relatively prime subsets of  $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$.  The first 10 values of $f(n)$ are 1, 2, 5, 11, 26, 53, 116, 236, 488, and 983.
(This is sequence A085945 in Sloane's {\it On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences}.)  
Let $f_k(n)$ denote the number of relatively prime subsets of  $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ of cardinality $k$.  
We present exact formulas and asymptotic estimates for $f(n)$ and $f_k(n)$.  These estimates imply that almost all finite sets of integers are relatively prime.  

No set of even integers is relatively prime.   
Since there are $2^{[n/2]} - 1$ nonempty subsets of
$\{2,4,6,\ldots,2[n/2]\}$ and $2^n-1$ nonempty subsets of
$\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$, we have the upper bound
\begin{equation}  \label{prim:upper}
f(n) \leq 2^n - 2^{[n/2]}.
\end{equation}
Similarly,
\begin{equation}   \label{prim:upper-fkn}
f_k(n) \leq {n \choose k} - {[n/2] \choose k}.
\end{equation}

If $1 \in A$, then $A$ is relatively prime.  Since there are $2^{n-1}$ sets $A \subseteq \{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ with $1 \in A$, we have
\[
f(n) \geq 2^{n-1}.
\]
Let $n \geq 3.$  If $1 \notin A$ but $2 \in A$ and $3\in A$, then $A$ is relatively prime and so
\[
f(n) \geq 2^{n-1} + 2^{n-3}.
\]
Let $n \geq 5.$  If $1 \notin A$ and $3 \notin A$, but $2\in A$ and $5\in A$, then $A$ is relatively prime.  If $1 \notin A$ and $2 \notin A$, but $3\in A$ and $5\in A$, then $A$ is relatively prime.  Therefore, 
\[
f(n) \geq 2^{n-1} + 2^{n-3} + 2\cdot 2^{n-4} = 2^{n-1} + 2^{n-2}.
\]
Similarly,
\[
f_k(n) \geq {n-1 \choose k-1} +  {n-3 \choose k-2} +  2{n-4 \choose k-2}.
\]


\section{Exact Formulas and Asymptotic Estimates}
Let $[x]$ denote the greatest integer less than or equal to $x$.  
If $x \geq 1$ and $n = [x]$, then
\[
\left[ \frac{x}{d} \right] = \left[ \frac{[x]}{d} \right] = \left[ \frac{n}{d} \right] 
\]
for all positive integers $d$.



Let  $F(x)$ be a function defined for $x \geq 1$, and define the function
\[
G(x) = \sum_{1 \leq d \leq x} F\left(\frac{x}{d}\right).
\]
In the proof of  Theorem~\ref{prim:theorem: f} we use the following version of the M{\" o}bius inversion formula (Nathanson~\cite[Exercise 5 on p. 222]{nath00A}):
\[
F(x) = \sum_{1 \leq d \leq x} \mu(d) G\left(\frac{x}{d}\right).
\]

\bt   \label{prim:theorem: f}
For all positive integers $n$,
\begin{equation}  \label{prim:recursion}
\sum_{d=1}^n f\left(\left[\frac{n}{d}\right]\right) = 2^n-1
\end{equation}
and 
\begin{equation}  \label{prim:explicit}
f(n) =  \sum_{d=1}^{n} \mu(d) \left(2^{[n/d]} -1\right).
\end{equation}
For all positive integers $n$ and $k$,
\begin{equation}   \label{prim:recursionfk}
 \sum_{d=1}^n f_k\left( \left[\frac{n}{d}\right]\right) = {n\choose k}
\end{equation}
and 
\begin{equation}  \label{prim:explicitfk}
f_k(n) =  \sum_{d=1}^{n} \mu(d) {[n/d] \choose k }.
\end{equation}
\et

\noindent{\it Proof.}
Let $A$ be a nonempty subset of $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$.  If $\gcd(A) = d$, then $A' = (1/d)\ast A = \{a/d : a\in A\}$ is a relatively prime subset of $\{1,2,\ldots,[n/d]\}$.  Conversely, if $A'$ is a relatively prime subset of $\{1,2,\ldots,[n/d]\}$, 
then $A = d\ast A'  = \{da' : a' \in A' \}$ is a nonempty subset of $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ with $\gcd(A)=d.$   It follows that there are exactly $f([n/d])$ subsets $A$ of $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ with $\gcd(A) = d$, and so
\[
\sum_{d=1}^n f\left(\left[\frac{n}{d}\right]\right) = 2^n-1.
\]
We apply M\" obius inversion to the function $F(x) = f([x]).$  For all $x \geq 1$ we define
\begin{align*}
G(x) & = \sum_{1 \leq d \leq x}  F\left(\frac{x}{d}\right) 
 = \sum_{1 \leq d \leq x}  f\left( \left[\frac{x}{d}\right] \right)  
  =  \sum_{d=1}^{[x]}  f\left( \left[\frac{[x]}{d}\right] \right) 
   = 2^{[x]} -1
\end{align*}
and so
\begin{align*}
f([x]) & = F(x)  = \sum_{1 \leq d \leq x} \mu(d) G\left(\frac{x}{d}\right) = \sum_{d=1}^{[x]} \mu(d) \left(2^{[x/d]} -1\right).
\end{align*}
For $n \geq 1$ we have
\[
f(n) =  \sum_{d=1}^{n} \mu(d) \left(2^{[n/d]} -1\right).
\]

The proofs of~\eqref{prim:recursionfk} and~\eqref{prim:explicitfk} are similar.
\hfill{$\Box$}

\bt  \label{prim:theorem:f(n)}
For all positive integers $n$ and $k$,
\[
2^n  - 2^{[n/2]} - n2^{[n/3]} \leq f(n) \leq 2^n - 2^{[n/2]}
\]
and
\[
{n \choose k} - {[n/2] \choose k} - n {[n/3] \choose k} 
\leq f_k(n) \leq {n \choose k} - {[n/2] \choose k}.
\]
\et

\noindent{\it Proof.}
For $n \geq 2$ we have
\[
2^n = f(n) + f([n/2]) + \sum_{d=3}^n f\left(\left[\frac{n}{d}\right]\right) + 1  \leq f(n) + 2^{[n/2]} + n2^{[n/3]}.
\]
Combining this with~\eqref{prim:upper}, we obtain
\[
2^n -  2^{[n/2]} - n2^{[n/3]} \leq f(n) \leq 2^n - 2^{[n/2]}.
\]
This  also holds for $n=1$.  

The inequality for $f_k(n)$ follows similarly from~\eqref{prim:upper-fkn} and~\eqref{prim:recursionfk}.  
\hfill{$\Box$}

Theorem~\ref{prim:theorem:f(n)} implies that $f(n)  \sim 2^n$ as $n \rightarrow \infty,$ and so almost all finite sets of integers are relatively prime.



\section{A phi Function for Sets}
The Euler phi function $\varphi(n)$ counts the number of positive integers $a \leq n$ such that $a$ is relatively prime to $n$.   
We define the function $\Phi(n)$ to be the number of nonempty subsets $A$ of $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ such that 
$\gcd(A)$ is relatively prime to $n$.  
For example, for distinct primes $p$ and $q$ we have
\[
\Phi(p) = 2^p - 2
\]
\[
\Phi(p^2) = 2^{p^2} - 2^p
\]
and 
\[
\Phi(pq) = 2^{pq}- 2^q - 2^p +2.
\]
Define the function $\Phi_k(n)$ to be the number of subsets $A$ of $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ such that $\card(A)=k$ and 
$\gcd(A)$ is relatively prime to $n$.  
Note that $\Phi_1(n) =\varphi(n)$ for all $n \geq 1$.



\bt   \label{prim:theorem:Phirecursion}
For all positive integers $n$,
\begin{equation}     \label{prim:Phirecursion-1}
\sum_{d|n} \Phi\left( d\right) = 2^n -1.
\end{equation}
Moreover, $\Phi(1)=1$ and, for $n \geq 2$,
\begin{equation}     \label{prim:Phirecursion-2}
\Phi(n) = \sum_{d|n} \mu\left(d\right) 2^{n/d}
\end{equation}
where $\mu(n)$ is the M\" obius function.
Similarly, for all positive integers $n$ and $k$,
\begin{equation}     \label{prim:Phirecursion-k1}
\sum_{d|n} \Phi_k( d) = {n \choose k}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}     \label{prim:Phirecursion-k2}
\Phi_k(n) = \sum_{d|n} \mu\left(d\right) {n/d\choose k}
\end{equation}
\et

\noindent{\it Proof.}
For every divisor $d$ of $n$, we define the function $\Psi(n,d)$ to be the number of nonempty subsets $A$ of $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ such that the greatest common divisor of 
$\gcd(A)$ and $n$ is $d$.  Thus, 
\[
\Psi(n,d) = 
 \card\left( \left\{ A \subseteq \{1,2,\ldots,n\} :A \neq\emptyset  \text{ and } \gcd(A \cup \{n\})=d  \right\} \right).
 \]
Then
\[
\Psi(n,d) = \Phi\left( \frac{n}{d} \right)
\]
and
\[
2^n -1 = \sum_{d|n} \Psi(n,d) =  \sum_{d|n} \Phi\left( \frac{n}{d}\right)  =  \sum_{d|n} \Phi(d).
\]
We have $\Phi(1)=1.$  For $n \geq 2$ we apply the usual M\" obius inversion and obtain
\begin{align*}
\Phi(n) & = \sum_{d|n} \mu\left(d\right) \left( 2^{n/d} -1\right)  \\
& = \sum_{d|n} \mu\left(d\right)  2^{n/d}
-  \sum_{d|n} \mu\left(d\right) \\
& = \sum_{d|n} \mu\left(d\right) 2^{n/d}
\end{align*}
since $\sum_{d|n}\mu(n/d)=0$ for $n \geq 2.$

The proofs of~\eqref{prim:Phirecursion-k1} and~\eqref{prim:Phirecursion-k2} are similar.
\hfill{$\Box$}



\bt  \label{prim:theorem:Phi}
If $n$ is odd, then 
\[
\Phi(n) = 2^n  + O\left( n2^{n/3} \right)
\]
and
\[
\Phi_k(n) = {n \choose k}  + O\left( n{[n/3] \choose k} \right).
\]
If $n$ is even, then
\[
\Phi(n) = 2^n  - 2^{n/2} + O\left( n2^{n/3} \right)
\]
and
\[
\Phi_k(n) = {n \choose k}  - {n/2 \choose k}   + O\left( n{[n/3] \choose k} \right).
\]
\et

\noindent{\it Proof.}
We have
\begin{align*}
\Phi(n) 
& = \sum_{\substack{d=1\\ \gcd(d,n)=1}}^n \card\left( \left\{ A \subseteq \{1,2,\ldots,n\} :A \neq\emptyset  \text{ and } \gcd(A)=d  \right\} \right) \\
& = \sum_{\substack{d=1\\ \gcd(d,n)=1}}^n f([n/d]).
\end{align*}
Applying Theorem~\ref{prim:theorem:f(n)}, we see that if $n$ is odd, then
\begin{align*}
\Phi(n) 
& = f(n) + f([n/2]) + \sum_{ \substack{d=3\\ \gcd(d,n)=1} }^n f([n/d]) \\
& = \left( 2^n - 2^{[n/2]} + O\left(n2^{n/3}\right)\right)
+ \left( 2^{[n/2]} + O\left(2^{n/4}\right)\right)
+O\left( n2^{n/3} \right) \\
& = 2^n + O\left( n2^{n/3} \right).
\end{align*}
If $n$ is even, then
\begin{align*}
\Phi(n) 
& = f(n)  + \sum_{ \substack{d=3\\ \gcd(d,n)=1} }^n f([n/d]) \\
& = \left( 2^n - 2^{n/2} + O\left(n2^{n/3}\right)\right)
+O\left( n2^{n/3} \right) \\
& = 2^n  - 2^{n/2} + O\left( n2^{n/3} \right).
\end{align*}
These estimates for $\Phi(n)$ also follow from identity~\eqref{prim:Phirecursion-2}.  The estimates for $\Phi_k(n)$ follow from identity~\eqref{prim:Phirecursion-k2}.  
This completes the proof.
\hfill{$\Box$}

\vskip 30pt
\noindent
{\bf Acknowledgements.}  I thank Greg Martin for the observation
that~\eqref{prim:explicit} and~\eqref{prim:explicitfk} follow
from~\eqref{prim:recursion} and~\eqref{prim:recursionfk} by M\" obius
inversion, and Kevin O'Bryant  for helpful discussions.


\providecommand{\bysame}{\leavevmode\hbox to3em{\hrulefill}\thinspace}
\providecommand{\MR}{\relax\ifhmode\unskip\space\fi MR }
% \MRhref is called by the amsart/book/proc definition of \MR.
\providecommand{\MRhref}[2]{%
  \href{http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=#1}{#2}
}
\providecommand{\href}[2]{#2}
\begin{thebibliography}{1} \footnotesize

\bibitem{nath00A}
M.~B. Nathanson, \emph{Elementary Methods in Number Theory}, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 195, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.

\end{thebibliography}


\end{document}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%


If $n/2 < d \leq n,$ then $f([n/d]) = f(1) = 1$ and 
\[
f(n) = 2^n-1 - \sum_{2 \leq d \leq n/2} f\left(\left[\frac{n}{d}\right]\right)
- n + \left[\frac{n}{2}\right].
\]


\section{Data}
The following table compares $f(n)$   to the  
upper and lower bounds in Theorem~\ref{prim:theorem:f(n)}.


%\newpage
\vspace{0.2cm}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|r|r|r|r|r|}
\hline
$n$&lower bound& $f(n)$ & upper bound \\ \hline
           5& 18& 26& 28\\
                                           10& 912& 983& 992\\
                                                               15& 32160& 32603& 32640 \\
                      20& 1046272& 1047479& 1047552\\
                  25& 33543936& 33550058& 33550336\\
             30& 1073678336& 1073707991& 1073709056\\
         35& 34359535616& 34359605123& 34359607296\\
        40& 1099510251520& 1099510570790& 1099510579200\\
        45& 35184366419968& 35184367861319& 35184367894528\\
     50& 1125899870011392& 1125899873221781& 1125899873288192\\
       \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}






\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|r|r|r|r|r|}
\hline
$n$&lower bound& $f(n)$ & upper bound \\ \hline
1&0& 1 &1 \\
2&0& 2 & 2\\
3&0& 5 & 6\\
4&4& 11 & 12\\
           5& 18& 26& 28\\
                         6& 32& 53& 56\\
                        7& 92& 116& 120\\
                        8& 208& 236& 240\\
                        9& 424& 488& 496\\
                       10& 912& 983& 992\\
                      11& 1928& 2006& 2016\\
                      12& 3840& 4016& 4032\\
                      13& 7920& 8111& 8128\\
                    14& 16032& 16238& 16256\\
                    15& 32160& 32603& 32640 \\
                    16& 64768& 65243& 65280 \\
                   17& 130272& 130778& 130816 \\
                   18& 260480& 261566& 261632\\
                   19& 522560& 523709& 523776\\
                 20& 1046272& 1047479& 1047552\\
                 21& 2093440& 2095988& 2096128\\
                 22& 4189440& 4192115& 4192256\\
                 23& 8383616& 8386418& 8386560\\
                24& 16766976& 16772858& 16773120\\
                25& 33543936& 33550058& 33550336\\
                26& 67094016& 67100393& 67100672\\
              27& 134195712& 134209001& 134209536\\
              28& 268404736& 268418531& 268419072\\
              29& 536839680& 536853986& 536854528\\
             30& 1073678336& 1073707991& 1073709056\\
             31& 2147419136& 2147449814& 2147450880\\
             32& 4294868992& 4294900694& 4294901760\\
             33& 8589801472& 8589866963& 8589869056\\
           34& 17179668480& 17179736018& 17179738112\\
           35& 34359535616& 34359605123& 34359607296\\
           36& 68719067136& 68719210403& 68719214592\\
          37& 137438539776& 137438687138& 137438691328\\
          38& 274877227008& 274877378465& 274877382656\\
          39& 549754970112& 549755281310& 549755289600\\
        40& 1099510251520& 1099510570790& 1099510579200\\
        41& 2199021871104& 2199022198565& 2199022206976\\
        42& 4398043725824& 4398044397386& 4398044413952\\
        43& 8796090220544& 8796090908489& 8796090925056\\
       44& 17592181129216& 17592181833539& 17592181850112\\
       45& 35184366419968& 35184367861319& 35184367894528\\
       46& 70368734281728& 70368735755846& 70368735789056\\
     47& 140737478426624& 140737479933509& 140737479966720\\
     48& 281474956787712& 281474959867589& 281474959933440\\
     49& 562949933432832& 562949936578181& 562949936644096\\
    50& 1125899870011392& 1125899873221781& 1125899873288192\\
       \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}

