These pages are not updated anymore. For the current production of this journal, please refer to http://www.jstor.org/journals/0003486x.html.
Annals of Mathematics, II. Series Vol. 151, No. 3, pp. 11511173 (2000) 

Nonarithmetic superrigid groups: Counterexamples to Platonov's conjectureHyman Bass and Alexander LubotzkyReview from Zentralblatt MATH: A finitely generated group $\Gamma$ is called representation superrigid if for all its finite dimensional complex representations $\rho$ the dimension of the Zariski closure of $\rho(\Gamma)$ remains bounded. This property implies that $\Gamma$ is representation rigid, i.e., that it admits only finitely many nonisomorphic irreducible representations of any given dimension. The main result of the paper is as follows. Let $\Gamma$ be a cocompact lattice in the real rank 1 group $G$ of type $F_4$. Then there exist a finite index normal subgroup $\Gamma_1$ of $\Gamma$ and an infinite index subgroup $\Lambda$ of $\Gamma_1\times\Gamma_1$, containing the diagonal, such that any representation of $\Lambda$ extends uniquely to a representation of $\Gamma_1\times\Gamma_1$; the groups $\Lambda$ and $\Gamma_1\times\Gamma_1$ are representation superrigid, and all their representations are semisimple; $\Lambda$ is not isomorphic to a lattice in any product of groups $H(k)$, where $H$ is a linear algebraic group over a local field $k$. The proof relies on two opposite properties of $\Gamma$: it is superrigid in $G$ and hyperbolic in the sense of Gromov. The result contradicts a conjecture of Platonov claiming that a rigid linear group must be of arithmetic type. Reviewed by A.L.Onishchik Keywords: representation; group of arithmetic type; superrigid group; lattice Classification (MSC2000): 22E40 Full text of the article:
Electronic fulltext finalized on: 8 Sep 2001. This page was last modified: 22 Jan 2002.
© 2001 Johns Hopkins University Press
